Six Steps to Elevating Web Analytics in Your Organization September 3, 2008
Posted by debbiepascoe in accessibility, privacy, quality, search engine optimization, usability, web analytics, web design, web standards.Tags: accessibility, KPI, search engine optimization, web analytics, web optimization, web standards
add a comment
A website exists to further the organizational objectives of its owners. Those objectives are directly related to the nature and purpose of the organization. For example, the challenges for pure online companes like Amazon.com, Overstock.com, eBay and others are quite different from bricks-and-mortar businesses with online presence, which in turn is completely different from government agencies, universities or non-profit organizations.
Large organizations, particularly those with online/offline operations, have many competing interests and stakeholders. It is imperative for the organization to know whether their website is pointed in the right direction, whether it is structurally sound and able to deliver on its objectives, and whether landing and conversion event pages are being optimized over time. To the extent a site does this, it is in turn contributing to the organization’s larger goals and objectives – their true KPIs – increase leads, increase revenue, decrease cost per customer, improve self-serve rates, decrease complaint rates, increase inventory turn rate, etc.
Visitor measurement enables organizations to determine the effectiveness of their online presence. Online web analytics has received, and continues to receive, significant attention. A whole new discipline and career choice has emerged. Articles and blogs are written about it. It has its own industry association. Events have evolved that are devoted to it. All these things have cemented the term “web analytics” firmly in the online dictionary, and linked it at the hip with “visitor traffic”.
The downside is that online metrics have taken on a life of their own, as if the website is separate from the organization. The development of web-specific KPIs for example, puts the focus on short-term goals, not organization goals. While measuring web analyics data points that contribute to the organization’s overall success metrics is valid, those measurements are only a piece of the puzzle.
Management is bombarded everyday by people who claim to have the one thing to cure all ills. Managers may not understand the web environment well enough to ask for analysis that goes deeper than conversion rate or page views or any of the other basic measurements, and frankly, they shouldn’t be expected to. What they want is the “big picture” information, and what they need are people that understand these dynamics and that can be proactive in putting the web analytics information into the broader perspective.
In the recent “Where in the Organization is the Web Analyst” Survey, when asked “How do you feel about your web analytics activities”, 41% responded that they are frustrated because the organization does not act on the information, and 30% indicated they are overwhelmed with the amount of information they have to deal with. I believe this is a symptom of the internal disconnect between online and offline objectives.
And in the face of chaos lies great opportunity
With that framework, here are six things I believe savvy web analysts can to to raise their profile within their organizations.
- Understand the total business. Are you in an organization where inventory is important? Are you in an organization where supplying information or support after the sale is vital? Are you in an industry where the website drives leads for sales that occur offline? Are you a non-profit whose goal is to educate people and secure donations? Are you in a government agency, providing information and services to citizens? Are you in the news business, where despite falling subscription rates, lots of people still get their news from the daily paper? Even if you are in a business that “grew up” on the web, offline activities such as fulfillment, customer service and returns come into play.
- Understand how your organization measures itself against its strategic goals. If you don’t know what the overall organization goals are, ask. If you don’t get an answer, keep asking.
- Identify the “goal gaps”. Think about how the website contributes to – or gets in the way of – those goals, and identify how the information you see every day sheds light on where the two are aligned and where they are in conflict with each other.
- Apply the 80/20 rule. With enormous volumes of data, it can be difficult to know what to focus on – another issue pointed out in the Survey results. As you gain more clarity around the organization’s goals, and how the strategy for the website supports them, focus on the 20% of the visitor data that supports overall organization goals, and disregard the rest.
- Frame your conversations with management in the broader context. Even if you don’t get it exactly right, at a minimum, you’ll make your boss aware that you are interested in the success of the business as a whole and you’ll create an opportunity to expand the conversation.
- Widen your circle. Seek out and network with the people in your organization that are responsible for web standards, search optimization, search marketing, overall site quality, responding to customer comments about the site, responding to customer inquiries that come in through the site. Encourage them to share their insights with you and share yours with them.
Web analysts that can get outside the box, look at the nature of the organization they are part of, think about why it is there and what its goals are, how the website fits into the picture and what other moving parts impact decisions, and present their data in that context will elevate web analytics – and themselves – in the organization. Those that focus on short term goals based on web-specific KPIs risk being sidelined.
Do you agree? Disgree? Let me know your thoughts.
Continuing the Discussion with Joseph Carrabis July 19, 2008
Posted by debbiepascoe in mobile web, quality, search engine optimization, web analytics, web design, web standards.Tags: joseph carrabis, web analytics demystified, web optimization, website structures
3 comments
I’ve been participating in a very interesting discussion with Joseph on The Future of Web Analytics Demystified.
My comments to his most recent comments are posted there and here.
Joseph’s comments:
“…my experience and learning indicate that most business people don’t care about science.”
Agreed, however they don’t have to care about it to use it. Anyone who has ever used a tire gauge or a tape measure has employed a scientific calibration method.
Take web analytics; vendor produces web analytics tool – company buys web analytics tool – company is responsible for correct, complete and functioning implementation of web analytics tool – automated monitoring identifies implementation problems. This last step is the rub. The web analytics vendor specializes in providing the measurement tool, not the calibration tool. The company does not have to be expert at science to employ automated monitoring of their web analytics. It must, however have accountability at a senior level – one neck to grab – and a recognition that without this calibration, all bets are off, and that manual discovery of implementation problems is a complete and utter waste of valuable time that their web analysts could be using to do more important things. The results of my survey that is currently underway (Where in the Organization is the Web Analyst – July 15-22, 2008) will bear out the chronic problems that practitioners have with their own implementations.
Going back to Avinash’s observation – “We have too many damn tools!’” Yep, the toolbox has 4 hammers, 5 screwdrivers and a utility knife, and the task calls for cutting a mitered corner. Now I suppose you could position the utility knife, whack it with the hammer, wedge a screwdriver in the crevice, and repeat the process until you make your way across the board…..it’s possible, not efficient, the outcome will be really ugly, but it’s possible.
Joseph’s question : “Is the natural progression due to the tools being used, due to the information provider becoming more trusted, perhaps due to the people receiving the information finally having the cognitive readiness to accept the information as both valuable and valid, …?”
I believe it is a confluence of things contributing to maturation in organizations. The web has disrupted entire industries – newspapers, auto, real estate, travel, consumer goods, government agencies. It would be great if somebody had an “Easy Button” for managing web assets – maybe Staples could start loaning them out. People are coming to grips with the fact that no one product is the magic answer, and that jumping from one vendor to another is not the answer either. They are coming to grips with the complexity of their sites, the fact that legislation and market conditions are constantly changing, that they are subject to the laws of all the countries they operate sites in, that achieving good natural placement in Google has a tangible benefit, and that bad things can happen to good sites, and can lurk there for a long time, that if you’re a great big company, you might be a “target” for lawsuits by people who find your site inaccessible to them, that the mobile web tsunami is coming, all this in addition to the daily grind of figuring out who is looking at what for how long using what type of viewing device and what are they doing as a result? Joseph refers to it as “cognitive readiness”. I’ve always called it “the teachable moment.” Increasingly organizations are getting there.
Joseph’s comment:
“I’d love to see a piece that demonstrates the successful implementation of such a group if such is available.”
Here are a couple of success stories. The first one is a site of around 2000 pages owned by a company with numerous locations across the country. The site’s primary function is lead generation and information provision on health-related issues. SEO is important to them and they run online ad campaigns. They conduct surveys through the site. The organization supporting the site is small, so they rely on their vendors. Once a month, the manager has a call where all the vendors are present – site structure, web analyst, SEM, search analyst, survey company. Everyone is expected to present information and recommendations based on the agenda the manager sets.
The second is a global B2B company. Their public site is large, their intranet is sprawling, and they have a constant flow of micro-sites going up. Their web team consists of people with expertise in search, web analytics, copyrighting, marketing, ad campaigns; yet they all are part of one team. Content management is dispersed throughout the organization using a CMS that was developed in-house after they determined that there was not a market solution that fit their business. This team, however, has dotted lines to content owners and teams. Decisions of what web site management solutions they use (whether it is traffic, search, A/B testing, surveys, or structural analytics) are made by this team. They have developed and are utilizing web standards and continue to grow from strength to strength.
There are others. I like these two because they are at opposite ends of the spectrum and demonstrate that there is more than one way to get there, once people define what it is they are trying to achieve.
Your comments are most welcome. What are you seeing in your organization?
Web Optimization Defined June 18, 2008
Posted by debbiepascoe in high performance site analytics, metrics and measurement, quality, search, search engine optimization, usability, web analytics, web design, web standards.Tags: page rank, SEM, SEO, transformation, web analytics, web optimization, web standards
2 comments
I have noticed that variations on the term “web optimization” are increasingly bringing traffic to the blog – “what is web optimization’, “how to do web optimization”, for example. In checking my stats, these variations were by far the top terms in the past 90 days. This just tells me it’s time to describe this in fuller detail.
Web optimization is much bigger than increasing your Google page rank, increasing your page views, having a sexier design, identifying web analytics KPIs or any of the other facets of the prism you can name. While each of those activities is important, and we are happy that there are people who focus on them intently enough to become subject matter experts, none of them can stand alone. None has the magic pixie dust that will, if sprinkled correctly, yield the optimal web experience for users and beaucoup dollars for the site owners.
The evolution of these different disciplines, while important and necessary, has had some unfortunate side effects. The surveys I conducted in Dec/January reflect an example of these side effects. Web analytics practitioners are often isolated in their organizations. They have significant challenges in getting people to listen and take action. The person they report to is frequently not at a high enough level to effect changes across the site.
Web optimization is the “big tent” that not only welcomes, but actually needs all disciplines. To optimize, site owners must utilize complementary solutions that enable them to bring together data from different sources so they can make informed decisions.
We are out in the market every day, talking to companies about their web properties. What we know is that companies are tired of being confused, and are looking for a way forward. And that way combines these elements:
- Strategic alignment – ensure that the site strategy is aligned with business goals
- Structural integrity – ensure the site is structurally sound and is delivering a good visitor experience and that the key areas are being continually optimized.
- Governance – implementation of solutions, methods and practices that facilitate continuous improvement and monitoring of digital assets all across the organization, for quality and compliance metrics, search optimization, web analytics measurements, survey results, advertising campaign effectiveness.
You can not optimize in a sub-optimal environment. The fragmentation has to stop. It is costly and inefficient. Companies are spending huge amounts of money, hiring agencies, buying solutions, and training employees to create, manage, market and monitor web sites, and this fragmentation muddies the waters and keeps companies from truly understanding whether their activities yield – or are even capable of yielding – the results they want for themselves and their visitors.
This message is resonating loud and clear with the people we talk to. It clears away the “magic pixie dust” cacaphony that surrounds and bombards their senses every day. It’s water in the desert, light in the dark, it’s……well, i’ve run out of pithy metaphors, but you get the picture
Do you agree or disagree? What are your observations?
